|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Anacrit Mc'Sinister
   |
Posted - 2007.12.08 13:27:00 -
[1]
i seem to remmeber Devs Q&A not so long ago saying "Amar Didnt get ther "Umff" yeat....and it looked like it will happen soon.
still waiting.
and yes, amar is not that bad, but, after snad a half years in eve i can feet armageddon rather well..the problem is that people with the same skill point as me can fit domenix much, much better.
infact sinse i wasn in this game i saw galante steadely improove, (and improove some more in trinity) amar however improoved once ( with all teh traching) btu then slowly keeped getting wothr with all the chenges that suport other races.
|
Anacrit Mc'Sinister
|
Posted - 2007.12.09 01:23:00 -
[2]
could ve please have Devs reply to this..
cou we have a
"NO - we will not chenge amarr, we think they are fine as they are" or
" yes, we wil be loking in to it at some point"
i would be really great to know if the we should abbandon our eforts or and move on, or wait for better time
|
Anacrit Mc'Sinister
|
Posted - 2007.12.09 15:08:00 -
[3]
i must say i wouldnt like that to happen. it would mean that you have to tanslate your skill sin weaponry. and not to mention that the only thing you can become is Galante...or theyll have to translate half of your mechanical skills in to shields and navigation...
i dont think that can be an answer.
|
Anacrit Mc'Sinister
|
Posted - 2007.12.11 11:05:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Anacrit Mc''Sinister on 11/12/2007 11:05:37
actually arbitrator was improoved and so were the tracking destruptors. arby can pack 3 waves of mid drones and tracking destruptors are now more fitted to siferent situations.
the fact is that arby is the only improvement
|
Anacrit Mc'Sinister
|
Posted - 2007.12.12 23:43:00 -
[5]
 Originally by: Oreonea
They want to do something (CCP) but they don't know what yet, it's obvious Amarr needs some kind of boost. Be nice if you throw us Amarr a tiny something for x-mas though ^^ Even if it's something that won't make us on par with everyone, at least something to tide us over until something that works is thought up?
love your optemism
but, to all those great sugestions of why dont you put some rails/autocanons/BASTERS -
no! . why should we spend month training t2 blasters not bocouse we whant to have some veriety but becouse we have no choice. next thing that will happen is " why dont we train Galantey battleships!? might as well since everything we trained for many month for amar is now usless.
in a year or 2 well be able to post pictures of our skill trees to people and they wil be saying "hey look this are the guys who spend 2 years training amar, lol"
nop. dont want that to happen
an now for some of the best set ups
arbitrator. 2 mining lasers 5 mining drones. 3 mining drone rigs. 150% mining yelds! from drones ypull out mine a medium barge with that . although mirmidon or domy can do teh same thing + tanking a 0.0 spawn....still its a cool idea
|
Anacrit Mc'Sinister
|
Posted - 2007.12.14 14:37:00 -
[6]
Quote:
I was on the live dev blog from the beginning. One of the first issues they talked about was the Amarr problem. They aknowledged the forum discussion and sad that they are working on it and the results will be seen in the so called "Boost Patch" that they discussed about.
There are of course no details yet..they are working on possible solutions (some will certanly be ship based) and sad there will be more details regarding the patch after new year.
Anyway sone of the devs (Hammer i think)sad he will blog about the patch soonish.
well, thats good enough for me, still, i would like to see an actuall devs eply in this thread saying just that.
thy can damn well close this thread after that
|
Anacrit Mc'Sinister
|
Posted - 2007.12.16 06:30:00 -
[7]
bla..
Quote:
on...
Patch 3910 - Tachyon boost
Patch 33752 - 25% boost to pulse laser tracking, increased CPU need on EANM (nerf EM-strong 'omni tanks'), medium beam laser power requirements reduced.
Patch 36191 - Khanid Mk II, Armageddon CPU increased, Zealot CPU & Power increased.
Don't even start on the tracking... first of all, at least know you're own weapons FFS... beams have higher tracking than the equivalent Railguns or Artillery, 44.6% and 54.7% more respectively.
Tracking tracking tracking... don't make me laugh, with a Megapulse II for 78% of the tracking of an 800mm II at 500% optimal range, and 54% higher optimal + falloff. Compared to a Neutron
more blah....
if you dont fly amarr ships - dont spam with "i read teh patchnotes and came to a conclusion..."
you just dont know.
and as far as the balanced pvp expirience goes , which is what this game should be aming for - caldary will be out of reach and with some good ewar and if you lucky to last till there capasitor runs out - the launchers will keep going.(althoug i must say i fealt good about gimping of torps) galantey will be next to you between 10 to 20 seconds. depending if you have a web or not. mimatar wil be hard to hit but even when you do - bace resistance of 70%EM on bs shoeld and 75/92 resistance on hacs will mak your turets impotant. and just emagin if they have an omnitank mod fitted.
infact i dont think ther is much wrong with amar - (apart from asult frigats where mined bogles as to what was the plan for retribution and maybe abbadon)
teh otehr races are on the other hand in need of a nerf.
1. could take away i mid slot from all ther races. (and give caldary extra low)
2. ( and that is a slightly more realistic one) no omnitaking mods AT ALL. in which case amar will have a reasonable advantage of having an extra low slot. and with that minmatar will have to loose tehre 70 % bace resistance to make it feir
|
Anacrit Mc'Sinister
|
Posted - 2007.12.16 13:13:00 -
[8]
Quote:
Quite the opposite, because I don't fly them I'm not biased towards them, but look at the cold hard numbers rather than some emotive "But I FLY amarr and this is what FEELS wrong".
what? what? are you serious about this statment?
|
Anacrit Mc'Sinister
|
Posted - 2007.12.16 20:14:00 -
[9]
Quote:
Ah sod it, you aren't even reading my posts (click that link for instance, oh look cruise missile, not a frigate...)
thats right - leave - you have nothing to put in to this. you fly galanty which is by all acounts the most powerfull race. you dont fly amarr...JUST reading teh patch notest IS NOT ENOUGH.
|
Anacrit Mc'Sinister
|
Posted - 2007.12.24 00:54:00 -
[10]
OH what the hell, one more wount hirt, but wiht the anounsment of the "feel Good" patch for after new year id like to draw atantion to stuff that we realy dont want to see chsnged.
for example arbitrator - a damn great ship. Same as with al the amar ships you need some dearly hight skills to really make it work, but once you do and got a good set up - it will easely walk over most more expancive cruisers of other races. really dont whantt o see that chnged
And then there is Armageddon - even on fearly low skills its a great ship. grat dps ( even with a tank setup) and pleny of drone space. dont want to see that chnged either.
|
|
|
Anacrit Mc'Sinister
|
Posted - 2008.01.10 01:24:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Anacrit Mc''Sinister on 10/01/2008 01:26:03
Good news! after a couple month of extra training for a the only misile boat i-amar have, i have tryed it out. yes. new sacrelige rocks like nothing elce in amar. its is sn unbelivably easey fit ( compair to most other amar things) Huray.
unfortunaly i will now have an other month of misile skills to train ( to make it the best thing in the world) and then i will only be able to use those skils on 1 ship. sacrelige. that kined of dampns my hapines.
if only we could have moller with misiles, or any other t1 ship.
or maybe a batlecruiser?
anyway - i am strting to loose fath in this thread. maybe we can have a new one - Amar self help! hello - im an amar pilot.
|
Anacrit Mc'Sinister
|
Posted - 2008.01.10 01:28:00 -
[12]
ah gabriel is back, that expert on amar who doesnt fly any amar ships.
|
|
|
| |
|